Sounds great! It should be an easy one to get through, > On 8 May 2017, at 08:35, Greg Spiers <gspi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:26 AM, David Hart via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: > > > On 7 May 2017, at 20:12, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: > >> Today these keywords have no meaning inside a protocol, so clearly it should >> be an error to use it in that context. I agree with Jordan that the error >> should be on the protocol. >> >> It's entirely a different conversation whether the keyword should have >> meaning or not. If it should, it seems to me it should be limited to >> protocols that are limited to classes. But that's an additive feature we can >> discuss later. >> >> The source-breaking bug fix that is more pressing today is removing >> meaningless keywords that can be misleading to users, because they have no >> effect but look like they should. > > Exactly the trap I fell into when I found this issue. > > > Yup, +1. Who wants to write a proposal? > > I'd like to give it a try. I can write up the proposal to remove the keywords > in protocols and will post a draft here for further discussion. > > >> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 11:00 Goffredo Marocchi via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >> It would be useful to have a longer discussion on this as... I think that >> weak has a place there and should be enforced as a protocol is the public >> facing interface/api for the types who decide to adopt it. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On 7 May 2017, at 15:41, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution >> > <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>> wrote: >> > >> > browse >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org> >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org> >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution >> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org> > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution> > >
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
