> On Aug 1, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Daryle Walker via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > A tuple can have its members initialized in piecemeal and still satisfy > deterministic initialization. The named types need to do all their > sub-objects' initializations before any designated initializer ends. I want > the former for array instances, not the latter. It’s important for numeric > applications, so math arrays don’t have to be set twice, once for an > arbitrary default and again for the real data.
Eh? What do you mean by "initialized in piecemeal"? These both give errors: let x:(Int, Int) = (0) // something about not being able to convert `Int` to `(Int, Int)` let x:(Int, Int) = (0, _) // something about "_" only being allowed in patterns Is that what you're talking about? - Dave Sweeris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
