> On Oct 1, 2017, at 4:30 PM, Matt Whiteside via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > > >> That said, it’s unclear to me that superscript T is clearly an operator, any >> more than would be superscript H (Hermitian), superscript 2, superscript 3, >> etc. But at any rate, this would be discussion for the future > > Allowing superscripted characters to be used as operators seems like it would > take the proposal down a rabbit hole.
Don’t worry: IIRC, that operator isn’t accepted by Swift 4, so it wouldn’t be the topic of the first rounds of the proposal. I was simply trying to get across the idea of “design for utility”, and the utility of superscript T is really about transposing matrices. That proposal would be a follow-on after the already-accepted set of stuff is rationalized :) -Chris _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
