if it wasn't already discussed here is the preliminary proposal, if it was
then my +1 to the feature.
i propose we have an explicit apparatus to denote classes having stack
storage.
stack class StackObject { // guaranteed to be on stack
}
class NonStackObject { // is not guaranteed to be on stack, can be on heap
as well
}
this is for performance reasons. sometimes what we need is “structs with
deinit” and as this is not going to happen the next best thing could be
“lightweight” classes. this shall be self obvious, here are few examples:
stack class StackObject {
var variable = 0
func foo() {
print(“i am ok to live on stack”)
}
}
stack class BadObject {
var variable = 0
func foo() {
DispatchQueue.main.async { // error: can’t be a stack class
self.variable = 1
}
}
}
class NonStackObject {
…
}
foo() {
let stackObject = StackObject()
DispatchQueue.main.async {
stackObject.foo() // error: can’t use a stack object in this
context
}
}
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
