> On Oct 29, 2017, at 8:23 AM, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution 
> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Oct 29, 2017, at 4:04 AM, Lukas Stabe <lu...@stabe.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 28. Oct 2017, at 23:10, Chris Lattner via swift-evolution 
>>> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> … which is to say, exactly identical to the Python version except that new 
>>> variables need to be declared with let/var.  This can be done by blessing 
>>> Python.Object (which is identical to “PyObject*” at the machine level) with 
>>> some special dynamic name lookup behavior:  Dot syntax turns into a call to 
>>> PyObject_GetAttrString, subscripts turn into PyObject_GetItem, calls turn 
>>> into PyObject_Call, etc.  ARC would be implemented with INCREF etc.
>> 
>> That sounds like a very interesting prospect. Do you think it would make 
>> sense to make the language features that facilitate this (dynamic dispatch 
>> of method calls, property accesses, subscript and ARC) available to Swift 
>> classes annotated in some way, so that interop like this can be implemented 
>> as a library without special treatment by the Swift compiler? This could 
>> also enable more dynamic DSL like features.
> 
> I haven’t explored enough of the design space to be sure, but I’d want to 
> make sure that a library version of this could be done without giving up 
> ergonomics of the result.  If you were interested in being able to interop 
> with other languages that are dynamically typed and reference counted, then 
> something like this could be possible in principle:

Thinking about the Perl case makes it clear to me that this should not be built 
into the compiler as a monolithic thing.  Perl supports several different types 
(SV/AV/HV) which represent different concepts (scalars, arrays, hashes) so 
baking it all together into one thing would be the wrong way to map it.  In 
fact, the magic we need is pretty small, and seems generally useful for other 
things.  Consider a design like this:


// not magic, things like Int, String and many other conform to this. 
protocol Pythonable {
  init?(_ : PythonObject)
  func toPython() -> PythonObject
}

// Not magic.
struct PythonObject : /*protocols below*/ {
   var state : UnsafePointer<PyObject>

   subscript(_ : Pythonable…) -> PythonObject {
     ...
   }
}

// Magic, must be on the struct definition.  
// Could alternatively allow custom copy/move/… ctors like C++.
protocol CustomValueWitnessTable {
  static func init(..)
  static func copy(..)
  static func move(..)
  static func destroy(..)
}

// Magic, allows anyobject-like member lookup on a type when lookup otherwise 
fails.
protocol DynamicMemberLookupable {
   associatedtype MemberLookupResultType
   func dynamicMemberLookup(_ : String) -> MemberLookupResultType
}

// Magic, allows “overloaded/sugared postfix ()”.
protocol CustomCallable {
  func call( …)
}

The only tricky thing about this is the call part of things.  At least in the 
case of python, we want something like this:

   foo.bar(1, 2, a: x, b: y)

to turn into:
  foo.dynamicMemberLookup(“bar”).call(1, 2, kwargs: [“a”:x, “b”:y])

We don’t want this to be a memberlookup of a value that has “bar” as a basename 
and “a:” and “b:” as parameter labels.

-Chris

> 
> protocol DynamicDispatchable { // Protocol is “magic" known by the compiler.
>  func retain()
>  func release()
>  func memberLookup(_ : String) -> Self
>  func subscript<T>(_ : T) -> Self
>  func call(_ args: [Self]) -> Self
> } 
> 
> module Python {
>  struct Object : DynamicDispatchable {
>    var state : UnsafePointer<PyObject>
> 
>    func retain() {
>       INCREF(self)
>   }
> 
>     func memberLookup(_ : String) -> Object {
>        PyObject_GetAttrString(…)
>     }
>    etc
>  }
> 
> module Perl5 { 
>   struct Object : DynamicDispatchable {
>    var state : UnsafePointer<SV>
> 
>    func retain() {
>       SvREFCNT_inc(self)
>   }
> ….
> 
> 
> 
> Are there other uses for such a thing?
> 
> -Chris
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-evolution mailing list
> swift-evolution@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to