Hi Chris,

There are only a few examples in the proposal that demonstrate using dynamic 
member lookup.

I suppose that some examples will look like this:

let foo: PyRef = ...
foo.bar // translates into foo[dynamic: “bar”]
foo.bar.baz // translates into foo[dynamic: “bar”][dynamic: “baz”]

and if we have:

extension PyRef {
    var one: Int {
        return 1
    }
}

foo.bar.one // returns 1, because it translates into foo[dynamic: “bar”].one

This to me is hinting that dynamic member lookup will only be applied to one 
property at a time. In order for it to work on multiple levels, the type being 
returned by the subscript operation must still conform to DynamicMemberLookup. 
Is this how you envisioned it to work?

Cheers,
Andrew

> Hi All,
> 
> As a peer to the DynamicCallable proposal 
> (https://gist.github.com/lattner/a6257f425f55fe39fd6ac7a2354d693d 
> <https://gist.github.com/lattner/a6257f425f55fe39fd6ac7a2354d693d>), I’d like 
> to get your feedback on making member lookup dynamically extensible.  My 
> primary motivation is to improve interoperability with dynamic languages like 
> Python, Perl, Ruby, Javascript, etc, but there are other use cases (e.g. when 
> working with untyped JSON).
> 
> In addition to being a high impact on expressivity of Swift, I believe an 
> implementation can be done in a way with changes that are localized, and thus 
> not have significant impact on the maintainability of the compiler as a 
> whole.  Once the pitch phase of this proposal helps refine the details, I’ll 
> be happy to prepare an implementation for consideration.
> 
> In case it is useful, I’m working on cleaning up my current prototype Python 
> bindings.  I’ll share them in the next day or two in case they are useful to 
> provide context.  It is amazingly simple: less than 500 lines of Swift code 
> (plus some small additional C header glue to work around clang importer 
> limitations) enables impressive interoperability.  The only problems are the 
> verbosity addressed by this proposal and the peer DynamicCallable proposal.
> 
> 
> Here is the canonical proposal URL:
> https://gist.github.com/lattner/b016e1cf86c43732c8d82f90e5ae5438 
> <https://gist.github.com/lattner/b016e1cf86c43732c8d82f90e5ae5438>
> 
> A snapshot of the proposal is included below in case it is useful.  Thanks in 
> advance for help improving the proposal!
> 
> -Chris
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to