Hello, > Le 12 janv. 2018 à 02:36, Paul Cantrell via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> a écrit : > > The question I was weighing on it — what I thought Chris and Brent were > discussing — was whether this new protocol should be used narrowly for cases > of enums without associated types (which Chris favors), or whether it should > find more broad use to mean “type which can enumerate all of its possible > values” (which Brent finds interesting with caveats). This question has a > bearing on whether the protocol’s name should be CaseEnumerable or > ValueEnumerable.
A classic mantra on this mailing list is that stdlib protocols ought to come with generic use cases and algorithms. Is there any such use case, for either CaseEnumerable or ValueEnumerable, that are not already covered by sequence and the various collection protocols? Did I miss them in the proposal? Did I miss Xiaodi's post about the lack of such use cases? Gwendal _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
