I’m not sure if this would be considered or not, but I would like if the negation operator `!` would fade out.
If this is ever going to a review then I’d suggest that we add a pair of functions, one mutating and the other non-mutating. extension Bool { mutating func invert() { self = !self } func inverted() { return !self } } I’d rather use `inverted` instead of `!` because of the readability this function provides. if !items.contains(item) { ... } if items.contains(item).inverted() { ... } —— I personally have some other extensions like: extension Bool { @discardableResult func whenTrue<T>(execute closure: () throws -> T) rethrows -> T? { if self { return try closure() } return nil } @discardableResult func whenFalse<T>(execute closure: () throws -> T) rethrows -> T? { if !self { return try closure() } return nil } } But this is more a personal preference. —— That said, if the community is fine with the `invert/inverted` pair then I’d say go for it ;) Am 12. Januar 2018 um 09:14:22, Nate Cook via swift-evolution (swift-evolution@swift.org) schrieb: On Jan 12, 2018, at 12:15 AM, Chris Eidhof via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: Hey SE! When we have a bunch of nested structs: struct Sample { var bar: Bar } struct Bar { var show: Bool } var foo = Sample(bar: Bar(show: false)) It can be repetitive to toggle a deeply nested boolean: foo.bar.show = !foo.bar.show // duplication I sometimes add a `toggle` extension on `Bool` extension Bool { mutating func toggle() { self = !self } } This allows you to write the same code without duplication, and makes the intent clearer: foo.bar.show.toggle() I like it! In other languages, I don't think the `toggle` would make as much sense, but the mutable self makes this very useful. After I posted it on Twitter, it turns out I'm not the only one: https://twitter.com/PublicExtension/status/730434956376346624 I would have gone straight to a proposal, but I think we can do some bikeshedding about the name of `toggle`? Another verb that could work is `invert`. The `!` operator that does this is the negation operator, but I think `negate` could sound to some like "make this false" rather than toggling. Nate _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
_______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution