> On Jun 11, 2016, at 11:57 AM, David Sweeris via swift-users 
> <swift-users@swift.org> wrote:
> 
> You can’t pass a `let` as an `inout` argument. I’d guess that’s what’s 
> happening is the `arr[2]` part is creating a temporary var to which the `&` 
> part then provides a reference.

But `arr` is a var, not a let.

> `b` is then dutifully modified in the function, but there’s no mechanism for 
> copying it back into `arr` when `foo` returns

No, it gets copied back using subscript assignment. Remember, `inout` isn’t 
really passing the address of the parameter (although the optimizer may reduce 
it to that.) It’s literally in-and-out: the caller passes the original value, 
the function returns the new value, the caller then stores the new value where 
the old value came from.

I am not a Swift guru, but I think the problem in this example is that there’s 
a sort of race condition in that last post-return stage: the function has 
returned new values for both `arr` and arr[2]`, both of which get stored back 
where they came from, but the ordering is significant because arr[2] will have 
a different value depending on which of those assignments happens first.

This smells like those C bugs where the result of an expression depends on the 
order in which subexpressions are evaluated — something like “x = i + (i++)”. 
The C standard formally declares this as undefined behavior.

The part I’m still confused by is how `acopy` got modified within the `foo` 
function, since it’s declared as `let`. After staring at this for a while 
longer, I’m forced to conclude that the compiler decided it could optimize the 
`b` parameter by actually passing a pointer to the Int and modifying it 
directly, and that this has the side effect of modifying the Array object that 
`acopy` is pointing to, even though it’s supposed to be immutable.

In other words, this looks like a compiler bug. I can reproduce it with Swift 
2.2 (which is what my `swift` CLI tool says it is, even though I have Xcode 
7.3.1 and I thought that was Swift 2.3?)

—Jens
_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users

Reply via email to