Not really, unfortunately. The standard library is littered with types because
of exactly this (e.g. `MutableRangeReplaceableRandomAccessSlice`).
Conditional conformance can’t come fast enough!
> Hi All,
>
> Does anyone have a good workaround for generics not currently supporting
> conditional conformance to a protocol. As stated in the Generics Manifesto
> something like this would be nice:
>
> extension Array: Equatable where Element: Equatable {
> static func ==(lhs: Array, rhs: Array) ->Bool { ... }
> }
>
> But I would currently write a wrapper, something like:
>
> struct ArrayE<T: Equatable>{
> var elements: [T]
> }
> extension ArrayE: Equatable {
> static func ==(lhs: ArrayE, rhs: ArrayE) ->Bool { ...}
> }
>
> This can get unwieldy when there are a lot of conditional protocol extensions
> required, i.e. wrappers round wrappers.
>
> Is there a better way?
>
> Thanks for any tips,
>
> -- Howard._______________________________________________
> swift-users mailing list
> swift-users@swift.org
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
