@Anton, Yes that would work and we would get typed throws, which I like. As
an aside, I think E would have to be constrained to be an Error, `<E:
Error>`, and maybe `throws<E>` reads better because you are used to types
in angle brackets.
-- Howard.
On 13 January 2017 at 08:32, Anton Zhilin <antonyzhi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The best way to deal with such situations should be typed throws. Then
> rethrows should be removed and replaced with generics in throws clause. E
> == Never ⇔ function does not throw.
>
> struct FStore<E> {
> let f: () throws(E) -> Void
> init(_ f: @escaping () throws(E) -> Void) { self.f = f }
> func call() throws(E) { try f() }
> }
>
> let store = FStore<Never>({ print("Hello") })
> store.call()
>
> [Phase2]
>
>
_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
