Well, the question still remains about why the compiler chose init(exactly:) 
over init(). Shouldn’t there at least a warning of ambiguity?

Saagar Jha

> On May 1, 2017, at 12:11, Zhao Xin via swift-users <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> In my test, compiler thought you use `init?(exactly value: Double <>)`, which 
> returns nil. So this is not a bug.
> 
> Zhaoxin
> 
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 1:39 AM, Halen Wooten via swift-users 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm seeing a weird issue with using an initializer in flatMap. Here's
> an example:
> 
> ```
> let time: TimeInterval? = 662.82582598600004
> let intTimeFlatmap = time.flatMap(Int.init) // nil
> let intTime = Int(time!) // 662
> ```
> 
> I would expect for the flatMap call to return an optional Int with the
> proper value of 662. Is there something I'm misunderstanding, or is
> this a swift bug?
> 
> Thanks,
> Halen
> _______________________________________________
> swift-users mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users 
> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swift-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users

_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users

Reply via email to