Hi,
I have a library which uses a few generic protocols with identically named
associated types that may not always be specified identically by
implementors.
protocol Foo {
associatedtype Container
associatedtype Element
}
protocol Bar {
associatedtype Container
associatedtype Element
}
struct Baz: Foo, Bar {
// Implement using two different Container/Element types.
}
Is there a consensus on some naming convention for associatedtypes to
mitigate name collisions?
Would it be acceptable to add namespace prefixes to these types?
protocol Foo {
associatedtype FooContainer
associatedtype FooElement
}
I’m using the dictionary and thesaurus to find some alternative names I
could use, but the ones already used are so the most sensical semantically.
Do you have any suggestions?
Thanks,
- Steve Brunwasser
_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
