Hi Rod,

Thanks, we’re looking into it.

- Tony

> On Jun 15, 2017, at 9:14 PM, Rod Brown <rodney.bro...@icloud.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tony and Somu,
> 
> I have an open radar for this one which has been outstanding for a few months.
> 
> Radar #32191242
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> - Rod
> 
> 
> 
>> On 15 Jun 2017, at 10:27 am, Tony Parker via swift-users 
>> <swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Somu,
>> 
>> You can certainly file a bug for us. It may be something we are already 
>> tracking or already fixed, but the bug report will let us double check that.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> - Tony
>> 
>>> On Jun 13, 2017, at 12:33 PM, somu subscribe via swift-users 
>>> <swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot Jordan for pointing out the root cause.
>>> 
>>> The underlying executing and finished properties are readonly properties.
>>> 
>>> For an Asynchronous operation I had to override it tell when the 
>>> asynchronous operation completes. 
>>> 
>>> Since they are readonly properties I am unable to call the super on them to 
>>> set values.
>>> 
>>> I can still use String, was just wondering if there was a way to do it 
>>> using KeyPath. It is more out of enthusiasm to try out the KeyPath feature 
>>> in the project :) 
>>> 
>>> Would it be appropriate to file a bug report for the implementation of 
>>> Operation ?
>>> 
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> Muthu
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 14 Jun 2017, at 1:32 AM, Jordan Rose <jordan_r...@apple.com 
>>>> <mailto:jordan_r...@apple.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, Muthu. This is a longstanding issue with Operation—the Objective-C 
>>>> name of the property is just "executing", but the KVO keys that the 
>>>> implementors used is "isExecuting". Swift isn't set up to deal with this 
>>>> difference.
>>>> 
>>>> Fortunately, the base implementation of Operation already knows how to 
>>>> send the KVO notifications, so you shouldn't have to override these 
>>>> properties at all. If you still want to for some other reason, you can 
>>>> call super instead of storing to a private property.
>>>> 
>>>> Hope that helps,
>>>> Jordan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 13, 2017, at 06:40, somu subscribe via swift-users 
>>>>> <swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am having trouble using KeyPath to KVC (Key Value Code) in Swift 4.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have a subclass of Operation and I am overriding the isFinished and 
>>>>> isExecuting property.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Problem:
>>>>> - When I use KeyPath, the completionBlock of the operation is not invoked.
>>>>> - However when I use String instead of KeyPath, the completionBlock is 
>>>>> invoked.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Questions:
>>>>> - Am I missing something ? 
>>>>> - Is there a way to fix it using KeyPath ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Code:
>>>>> 
>>>>>     override var isExecuting : Bool {
>>>>>         
>>>>>         get {
>>>>>             return _executing //property in the class
>>>>>         }
>>>>>         
>>>>>         set {
>>>>>             willChangeValue(for: \.isExecuting)
>>>>>             _executing = newValue
>>>>>             didChangeValue(for: \.isExecuting)
>>>>>         }
>>>>>     }
>>>>>     
>>>>>     override var isFinished : Bool {
>>>>>         
>>>>>         get {
>>>>>             return _finished //property in the class
>>>>>         }
>>>>>         
>>>>>         set {
>>>>>             willChangeValue(for: \.isFinished)
>>>>>             _finished = newValue
>>>>>             didChangeValue(for: \.isFinished)
>>>>>         }
>>>>>     }
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Configuration:
>>>>> - Xcode - 9.0 beta (9M136h) 
>>>>> - Tested on Simulator (iOS 11)
>>>>> - macOS Sierra - 10.12.5 (16F73)
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks and Regards,
>>>>> Muthu
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> swift-users mailing list
>>>>> swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>
>>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users 
>>>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-users mailing list
>>> swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users 
>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users>
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-users mailing list
>> swift-users@swift.org <mailto:swift-users@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-users mailing list
swift-users@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-users

Reply via email to