Bonjour Axel, In DSMW, RDF synchronization is a side effects of text synchronization. However, we can use Logoot synchronization algorithm to synchronize RDF .. We have already developed several synchronization algorithms that can be used to synchronize RDF ..
If you are interested in P2P RDF synchronization, we can discuss that together .. Best regards, On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Axel Rauschmayer <a...@rauschma.de> wrote: > Next year, I want to implement something very similar for Hyena (the highest > priority being given to distributed version control for RDF). It sounds like > I could use your system instead. Could text editing synchronization and > peer-to-peer RDF synchronization be used independently? What RDF engine does > it use? Sesame? Jena? > > Merci bien! > > Axel > > On Oct 8, 2009, at 10:26 , Hala Skaf wrote: > >> Bonjour Heiko, >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Heiko Haller <heiko.hal...@fzi.de> wrote: >>> >>> Bonjour Hala, >>> >>> DSMW sounds really interesting. >> >> Merci ... >>> >>> Did I understnad this correctly (please correct me): >>> >>> In the subscribing Wiki, the subscribed pages are fully replicated and >>> read-only. >> >> The subscribed pages are fully replicated and they are read and write. >> You can modify them as normal wiki pages >> >>> So e.g. our local working group's SWM could subscribe to all conferences >>> listed on semanticweb.org and then would locally have the full pages from >>> sw.o but would not be able to make local changes to them. >> >> You can make local changes on your local copy. Your local modifications >> are >> not immediately visible by other wiki sites. You have to publish >> modifications, then >> these modifications become visible to subscribed sites. >> >>> Or if they are not read-only: How are conflicts resolved? >> >> DSMW integrates Logoot synchronisation algorithm. Logoot merges >> concurrent modifications. >> The conflicts are resolved automatically. You do not havemanually >> conflicts resolution >> as in MediaWiki. >> >> >>> Are these subscribed pages in the main namespace or in a distinct one? >>> If distinct: (how) does this also work for pages in special namespaces >>> (e.g. >>> subscribing to all properties and categories from another wiki)? I guess >>> not >>> because they can't be queried - right? Although that might be really >>> useful >>> - here's my featue request ;). >>> Or is it just the semantic information that gets syndicated? >>> >> >> DSMW does not limit the namespace. >> In fact, the subscribed pages are the result of semantic queries >> returned by SMW. >> >> Thank you for these interested questions .. >> If you have more questions do not hesitate to contact me .. >> >> Best regards, >> -- >> Hala Skaf-Molli >> Maître de Conférences >> Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy1 >> LORIA >> INRIA Nancy-Grand Est >> www.loria.fr/~skaf >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swikig mailing list >> swikig@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de >> http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/listinfo/swikig >> >> > > -- > axel.rauschma...@ifi.lmu.de > http://www.pst.ifi.lmu.de/~rauschma/ > > > > -- Hala Skaf-Molli Maître de Conférences Université Henri Poincaré, Nancy1 LORIA INRIA Nancy-Grand Est www.loria.fr/~skaf _______________________________________________ swikig mailing list swikig@aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de http://www.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/mailman/listinfo/swikig
