I don't understand why you call Character.toChars() if you've just
determined
you don't need to ?
ie what was wrong with
data = ( n >>> 16 == 0) ? {mapNumericReference((char) n)} :
Character.toChars(n);
?
In the case of an invalid supplementary pair, maybe it would be safer
to return { ' ' } ?
One thing I see in the parsing code that is not new or changed here, that
may bear examination, is that there's a loop that keeps on reading so long
so long there are new digits. I am not sure its wise to keep going once
you overflow.
-phil.
On 6/26/2012 12:37 AM, Vladislav Karnaukhov wrote:
Hello Pavel,
I can provide you with the link to 6u19, but this is direct
forward-port and no code changes were made.
I'll make changes as you've pointed out in 1) and 2)
About 3) - is it a requirement to use "? :" operator? I personally
prefer single-line if-else, but I don't want to argue over code style,
and surely I'll follow code design practices.
Regards,
- Vlad
On 6/25/2012 6:43 PM, Pavel Porvatov wrote:
Hi Vladislav,
Do you have a link to the fix for 6u19?
I didn't investigate the fix deeply, but
1.
private final int MAX_BMP_BOUND = 65535;
should be static (otherwise variable name should be in lower case)
2. Add a space in single line comments
3.
+ char data[];
+ if (n <= MAX_BMP_BOUND) {
+ data =
Character.toChars(mapNumericReference((char) n));
+ } else {
+ data = Character.toChars(n);
+ }
+
return data;
can be written in one line via "? :" operator and looks more readable
for me
Thanks, Pavel
Hello,
please review the fix for 6836089: Swing HTML parser can't properly
decode codepoints outside the Unicode Plane 0 into a surrogate pair.
This is a forward port from JDK6 (fixed escalated issue, fix
integrated) to JDK7.
The issue is a defect in Swing HTML Parser: if the codepoint is
outside BMP (Unicode Plain 0), Parser incorrectly decodes codepoint
into surrogate pair. The fix is to use Character.toChars() method if
codepoint value is greater than upper bound of BMP.
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vkarnauk/6836089/webrev.00/
Bug description:
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6836089
Regards,
- Vlad
