Hi Sergey,
Please review the following code change.
With Regards,
Avik Niyogi
> On 19-Mar-2016, at 2:15 am, Alexander Scherbatiy 
> <alexandr.scherba...@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> The fix looks good to me.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alexandr.
> 
> On 14/03/16 16:25, Avik Niyogi wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> Please review code changes made as per inputs provided.
>> 
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8151282/webrev.01/ 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Eaniyogi/8151282/webrev.01/>
>> With Regards,
>> Avik Niyogi
>>> On 14-Mar-2016, at 10:53 am, Avik Niyogi < 
>>> <mailto:avik.niy...@oracle.com>avik.niy...@oracle.com 
>>> <mailto:avik.niy...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Sergey,
>>> Seems like it is a delay issue. Will submit test case with a waitForIdle() 
>>> fix.
>>> 
>>> With Regards,
>>> Avik Niyogi
>>>> On 10-Mar-2016, at 7:22 pm, Sergey Bylokhov <sergey.bylok...@oracle.com 
>>>> <mailto:sergey.bylok...@oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, Avik.
>>>> A few questions.
>>>> - Why webrev contains the new file?
>>>> - You marked the test as a mac specific but it is iterates over a bunch of 
>>>> l&fs. It seems it should not be OS specific, but should check some 
>>>> specific l&fs (which support such icons): Metal, Nimbus, Aqua, 
>>>> Windows(???). So gtk/motif should be skipped.
>>>> 
>>>> On 08.03.16 8:10, Avik Niyogi wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kindly review the bug fix for JDK 9.
>>>>> 
>>>>> *Bug:*
>>>>> 
>>>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151282 
>>>>> <https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8151282>
>>>>> 
>>>>> *Webrev:*
>>>>> 
>>>>> _http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8151282/webrev.00/_ 
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aniyogi/8151282/webrev.00/_>
>>>>> _
>>>>> _
>>>>> *Issue:*
>>>>> The test case failed for GTK LAF.
>>>>> 
>>>>> *Cause:*
>>>>> The test case was meant to be Mac specific and was missing a jtreg 
>>>>> parameter
>>>>> 
>>>>> *Fix:*
>>>>> Minor change to test case with @requires tag added to set the fix.
>>>>> 
>>>>> With Regards,
>>>>> Avik Niyogi
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Best regards, Sergey.
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to