I suppose that is a start. We will likely want more tests later.
One thing to fix before this is pushed :
45 }catch(Exception cnf) {
missing spaces here.
-phil.
On 05/06/2016 12:22 AM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
Hi Phil,
yes, thank you. I've added a simpler black box test
for both Linux and Solaris just verifying that
neither of the flag values (well, of 2 and 3) prevents
GTK LaF initialization. Here we don't try to find which version
of the library is actually loaded.
Please see:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8156128/webrev.01/
Thanks,
-yan
On 05/05/2016 08:26 PM, Phil Race wrote:
30 # @requires os.family == "linux"
That and the test is very linux centric. Does it need to run on Solaris
too ?
Whilst that may only have gtk2 (not sure about S12) we should still
test.
-phil.
On 05/05/2016 07:23 AM, Yuri Nesterenko wrote:
Colleagues,
could you please review the tests for the new jdk.gtk.version property?
Webrev is http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8156128/webrev.00/
CR is https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156128
A couple of interesting scenarios would require some system preparation
(read: hacks) and are not intended for the regular use.
See https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156121 filed
after one of such special runs.
Thanks,
-yan
