It sounds like it would be easier to keep the files in the JDK then. I'll wait for other comments before I redo the patch.
On 10/14/16 12:28 PM, Phil Race wrote: > One big problem I see with this is that it means they will only be > available under the GPL license > as they will not be in an Oracle JDK which strips the GPL > > So if you are going to do this then these files first need to be > dual-licensed > because otherwise people can't link their commercial products with these. > > -phil. > > On 10/14/2016 08:51 AM, Pete Brunet wrote: >> Please review the following. >> >> The .h files and .c file provided to allow Assistive Technology to >> interface to the Java Access Bridge API are being removed from the built >> JRE/JDK images. They are not used much and they can be obtained online >> via the OpenJDK web site. The pubs will be updated to mention the >> location of the files. >> >> Since there is a .c file in this group of files the directory structure >> has been changed slightly to remove the include directory. >> >> There was one file missing from the group of files needed by developers >> and that was moved from the common to the bridge directory. >> >> The make was updated in response to the above. >> >> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8167213 >> >> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ptbrunet/JDK-8167213/webrev.00/ >
