Hi Ajit,

Thank you for your comments. I have incorporated all your comments.  There are 
also a few additional changes of invoking code on EDT that I made while 
executing this fix to validate the test stability. 

Updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akolarkunnu/8169958/webrev.01/


Thanks,
Srinivas M

-----Original Message-----
From: Ajit Ghaisas 
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 2:41 PM
To: Srinivas Mandalika <srinivas.mandal...@oracle.com>; 
swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: <Swing Dev> [9][TESTBUG]: Review Request for JDK-8169958 : 
javax/swing/JSpinner/5012888: Spinner value should be more than 1

Hi Srinivas,

   Here are few review comments :
   1.  Add this bug id to the @bug jtreg tag in test
   2. Replace generic import statements with specific ones
   3. You are calling - b.doTest(); - in a try catch block. This will catch any 
exception and print stack trace. 
       I think we can remove this try-catch block - simply make a call to 
b.doTest(), if an exception is thrown, it is thrown out from main() and jtreg 
framework will catch it and mark the test as failed.
   4. Line 63 in your file has a throw error - this can be converted to 
exception.
   5. Keep four spaces indentation level

Regards,
Ajit


From: Srinivas Mandalika 
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 1:51 PM
To: swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: <Swing Dev> [9][TESTBUG]: Review Request for JDK-8169958 : 
javax/swing/JSpinner/5012888: Spinner value should be more than 1

Hi All,

Please review the test bug fix for JDK-8169958 : javax/swing/JSpinner/5012888: 
Spinner value should be more than 1.

Issue: 
In this bug, click & hold on arrow of JSpinner only transfers focus and does 
not change spinner value. This behavior is intermittently seen in the automated 
test but is working as expected when checked for manualy. The test was failing 
robot clicks out of sync with the yet to be maximized frame.

Fix: 
Ensure the robot waits for the frame to be maximized before the clicks on the 
Spinner. Also ensure the main application frame is maximized explicitly.

Testing: 
Tested the potential fix on winx64, linux  with JDK8, 9 several times with 
running tests individually clubbed with the previous test and the entire suite 
(i.e javax/swing) put to ensure that the issue is not repeated.

Bug Id:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169958


WebRev Request:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akolarkunnu/8169958/webrev.00/


Regards,
Srinivas M

Reply via email to