On 08/11/2017 10:39, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
It also may be written as
int ntabs = (int)((x - tabBase) / tabSize);
return tabBase + (ntabs + 1) * tabSize
Yes "(int)+1" is also can be used for positive values, but the "ceil()"
is better since this purpose of this method, and in general it works for
negative values as well.
On 11/08/2017 10:24 AM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hi, Prasanta.
Is it possible that dropping the float part of "tabSize" and "x" will
cause Off-by-one error? For example:
float tabSize=3.99f;
float x=21.9f;
int tabBase=0;
649 int ntabs = ((int) x - tabBase) / (int)tabSize;
650 return tabBase + ((ntabs + 1) * tabSize);
The result is: ntabs=7 -> 31.92 which is not correct.
I guess you will need something like this:
int ntabs = (int) Math.ceil((x - tabBase) / tabSize);
return tabBase + ntabs * tabSize;
The result is: ntabs=6 -> 23.94
On 08/11/2017 03:25, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
Hi All,
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187957
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~psadhukhan/8187957/webrev.00/
Please review a fix for an issue where it is seen string with "tab"
in them are not aligned properly.
This is because while calculating tab stop postion, it is calculating
number of tabs in float value (an aftereffect of JDK-8156217
<https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156217>)
so next tab stop location is coming out wrong.
Fix is to use "number of tabs" as an integer value in order to
calculate the tab position correctly.
Regards
Prasanta
--
Best regards, Sergey.
