On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:25:44 GMT, Prasanta Sadhukhan <psadhuk...@openjdk.org>
wrote:
>> Starting in JDK 10, the default behavior of the standard doclet was
>> changed so that if a method is just being overridden for implementation
>> reasons, and there is no change in the public spec or signature, then
>> the method will not be listed in the main part of the summary table and
>> corresponding details section. Instead, it will just be listed along
>> with other inherited methods at the end of the summary section, in a
>> list which is renamed from "Methods inherited from ..." to "Methods
>> declared in ..."
>>
>> To be clear, this behavior only applies when there is nothing new to
>> document about the overriding method.
>>
>> "No change in spec" means either no doc comment or a comment that is
>> just `/** {@inheritDoc} */` or its whitespace equivalent.
>>
>> "No change in signature" covers publicly visibly changes like covariant
>> return, change in modifiers, change in throws list, etc.
>>
>> You can change the behavior on a per-instance behavior by providing
>> additional changes in the doc comment.
>>
>> javadoc still supports the old style of doc generation with a
>> command-line option, but for JDK docs, the default is the new behavior I
>> described.
>>
>> -- Jon
>>
>> On 4/1/21 5:43 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
>>>
>>> The |javadoc| tool (or the standard doclet) used to automatically copy
>>> the description from the superclass, and it seems that it no longer
>>> does. Perhaps @jonathan-gibbons
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/jonathan-gibbons__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nt46yROIsMrLvPBMvzgGTeSnhOvHtuHlNczVmgAJ-wPR9Lk254rhfVFX79WhAtjxN8g4zw$>
>>>
>>> could comment on this change?
>>>
>>> —
>>> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
>>> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/3213*issuecomment-811880830__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nt46yROIsMrLvPBMvzgGTeSnhOvHtuHlNczVmgAJ-wPR9Lk254rhfVFX79WhAtiQlz8B-g$>,
>>>
>>> or unsubscribe
>>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOUXBRUGHOZZ4X3NOBWRX63TGRS55ANCNFSM4Z3HDOJA__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nt46yROIsMrLvPBMvzgGTeSnhOvHtuHlNczVmgAJ-wPR9Lk254rhfVFX79WhAtg5YRT3Kw$>.
>>>
>
>>
>> Starting in JDK 10, the default behavior of the standard doclet was changed
>> so that if a method is just being overridden for implementation reasons, and
>> there is no change in the public spec or signature, then the method will not
>> be listed in the main part of the summary table and corresponding details
>> section. Instead, it will just be listed along with other inherited methods
>> at the end of the summary section, in a list which is renamed from "Methods
>> inherited from ..." to "Methods declared in ..." To be clear, this behavior
>> only applies when there is nothing new to document about the overriding
>> method. "No change in spec" means either no doc comment or a comment that is
>> just `/** {@inheritdoc} */` or its whitespace equivalent. "No change in
>> signature" covers publicly visibly changes like covariant return, change in
>> modifiers, change in throws list, etc. You can change the behavior on a
>> per-instance behavior by providing additional changes in the doc comment.
>> javadoc still suppo
rts the old style of doc generation with a command-line option, but for JDK
docs, the default is the new behavior I described.
>> […](#)
>> -- Jon
>> On 4/1/21 5:43 AM, Kevin Rushforth wrote: The |javadoc| tool (or the
>> standard doclet) used to automatically copy the description from the
>> superclass, and it seems that it no longer does. Perhaps @jonathan-gibbons
>> <[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/jonathan-gibbons__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nt46yROIsMrLvPBMvzgGTeSnhOvHtuHlNczVmgAJ-wPR9Lk254rhfVFX79WhAtjxN8g4zw$](https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/jonathan-gibbons__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nt46yROIsMrLvPBMvzgGTeSnhOvHtuHlNczVmgAJ-wPR9Lk254rhfVFX79WhAtjxN8g4zw%24)>
>> could comment on this change? — You are receiving this because you were
>> mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
>> <[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/3213*issuecomment-811880830__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nt46yROIsMrLvPBMvzgGTeSnhOvHtuHlNczVmgAJ-wPR9Lk254rhfVFX79WhAtiQlz8B-g$](https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/3213*issuecomment-811880830__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nt46yROIsMrLvPBMvzgGTeSnhOvHtuHlNczVmgA
J-wPR9Lk254rhfVFX79WhAtiQlz8B-g%24)>, or unsubscribe
<[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOUXBRUGHOZZ4X3NOBWRX63TGRS55ANCNFSM4Z3HDOJA__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nt46yROIsMrLvPBMvzgGTeSnhOvHtuHlNczVmgAJ-wPR9Lk254rhfVFX79WhAtg5YRT3Kw$](https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOUXBRUGHOZZ4X3NOBWRX63TGRS55ANCNFSM4Z3HDOJA__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Nt46yROIsMrLvPBMvzgGTeSnhOvHtuHlNczVmgAJ-wPR9Lk254rhfVFX79WhAtg5YRT3Kw%24)>.
>
> So, are you saying that even if we provide @inheritDoc, it will not be listed
> if there is no change in spec compared to super class?
On 4/1/21 8:26 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan wrote:
>
> So, are you saying that even if we provide @inheritdoc
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/inheritdoc__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!OR4b9howuG4BpVugrQEdNUuVqpxPta_Ff7BnXWbd-LDSRQ9jjAQ4mdGVtd097q0D29aUBA$>,
>
> it will not be listed if there is no change in spec compared to super
> class?
>
Yes.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3213
