On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 20:34:22 GMT, Alexey Ivanov <aiva...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> I dont see any update in JDK-8264217. Is this then considered to be a 
>>> javadoc bug? 
>> 
>> It does not matter is it a JavaDoc bug or feature. If it is a bug it will be 
>> fixed and spec will be returned for the current method. If it is an 
>> intentional feature to skip the identical comments in the subclasses then 
>> the spec in the current method will be intentionally skipped.
>
>> > I dont see any update in JDK-8264217. Is this then considered to be a 
>> > javadoc bug?
>> 
>> It does not matter is it a JavaDoc bug or feature. If it is a bug it will be 
>> fixed and spec will be returned for the current method. If it is an 
>> intentional feature to skip the identical comments in the subclasses then 
>> the spec in the current method will be intentionally skipped.
> 
> Then this bug is not an issue, right?
> 
> Unless we want to document that `JMenu.setComponentOrientation` _also sets_ 
> the orientation to _`popupMenu`_, which doesn't change the orientation of 
> menu items the `popupMenu` contains. However, it aligns with the 
> specification: use `applyComponentOrientation` to change the orientation of 
> the components contained within.

The behavior is not a javadoc bug.

If a method is overridden with no specified change in behavior, the 
method will be documented in the "Methods Declared In ..." list at the 
end of the main summary table.

-- Jon

On 4/7/21 1:07 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
>
>     I dont see any update in JDK-8264217. Is this then considered to
>     be a javadoc bug?
>
> It does not matter is it a JavaDoc bug or feature. If it is a bug it 
> will be fixed and spec will be returned for the current method. If it 
> is an intentional feature to skip the identical comments in the 
> subclasses then the spec in the current method will be intentionally 
> skipped.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/3213*issuecomment-815211518__;Iw!!GqivPVa7Brio!Pa32I0dQ97f0ZnfS2GJagqLEL_rDDUn_-KYlfMpVlhPTSTuZMR8dX8JS11YTkpCKIqVxAQ$>,
>  
> or unsubscribe 
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AOUXBRUWEZO3Y5GPQXJXSDTTHS3ORANCNFSM4Z3HDOJA__;!!GqivPVa7Brio!Pa32I0dQ97f0ZnfS2GJagqLEL_rDDUn_-KYlfMpVlhPTSTuZMR8dX8JS11YTkpAt6XZ-PQ$>.
>

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3213

Reply via email to