I think that the use of spamhaus got pulled into the default setup for
popular spam suites like spamassassin, which many operators running on a
shoestring just update onto their systems with out too much critical review
every time it comes out.

Such behaviour perforce leads to a bump-and-steer philosophy in spam
handling.  I'd be curious to know if it's still in the latest default setup
for these tools.

I had a problem with mail sent from a spamhaus.org blocked domain
(yahoo.com!) last month.  Whitelisted yahoo.com, and that was that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Roger Buchwalder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 10:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [swinog] spamhaus.org

Hi all

I don't unterstand, why someone should trust any Blacklist/Spamlist/whatelse
and delete some mail, who may probably hit one of thouse lists.
_Never_ /dev/null any mail, only weighting them, and if the wieght is much,
then move it to a spamfolder on the recipients maildir.

[a] I don't unterstand spamhaus, why they don't contact the isp of those
domains
[b] I don't unterstand admins who trust any lists 100% (I _was_ one of them)
[c] I don't unterstand why _Spam_haus take care about phishing (how about
Phishinghaus?)

nice weekend
rog

Matthias Hertzog schrieb:
> [1] = Bullshit
> [2] = No, we don't use ugly/useless/badly-maintained things like that.
> 
> nic.at hat a "discussion" with them this week. Spamhaus listed their 
> mailservers. What a "great" idea, to blacklist a registry. :-(
> 
> Best wishes,
> Matthias
> 
> _________________________________________
> 
> mhs @ internet AG
> Zürcherstrasse 204, CH - 9014 St. Gallen
> Phone +41 71 274 93 93, Fax +41 71 274 93 94
> http://www.mhs.ch
> _________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andreas Anderson" 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 2:20 PM
> Subject: [swinog] spamhaus.org
> 
> 
>> Hi Guys.
>>
>> any opinions on the game [1] that spamhaus.org is playing? Is there 
>> someone left who uses them to reject mails on smtp level?
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/91587
>>
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Live Search delivers results the way you like it. Try live.com now! 
>> http://www.live.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swinog mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> swinog mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
> 

_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

Antwort per Email an