Hello Sunrise,
many thanks for your (anonymous) feedback. <Offtopic> Ok, I have not seen this other discussion - and simply I do NOT want to start this "relegious" discussion about it. For me personally it is "bad behaviour" to use RFC1918 in internet public based services / routes. For sure others CAN do, because it is not strictly forbidden. This is for me also a general "problem" according RFC's: what is "MUST" and what is "SHOULD".... So I stop it here. </Offtopic> Back to my case: Here see the traces which use RFC1918 in your backbone. So you assign it ! Or may send me an introduction why I am wrong. May I missed something. Many thanks in advance, Best Regards Stephan remark: 192.168.12.254 is your CPE / Fritzbox /root: traceroute local.ch traceroute to local.ch (185.101.119.163), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 192.168.12.254 (192.168.12.254) 0.826 ms 0.650 ms 0.559 ms 2 10.136.71.241 (10.136.71.241) 18.020 ms 18.421 ms 18.051 ms 3 172.16.19.146 (172.16.19.146) 22.824 ms 22.594 ms 20.392 ms 4 172.16.19.145 (172.16.19.145) 20.397 ms 23.046 ms 22.561 ms 5 194.230.108.185 (194.230.108.185) 18.058 ms 19.911 ms 19.526 ms 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 oer02pe05.ge1-0-19.bb.sunrise.net (212.161.250.138) 20.847 ms oer02pe05.ge1-0-0.bb.sunrise.net (212.161.250.134) 22.801 ms 22.368 ms 9 195.141.229.234 (195.141.229.234) 22.636 ms 22.517 ms 22.724 ms 10 * * * 11 * * * (snip) /root: traceroute -I local.ch traceroute to local.ch (185.101.119.163), 64 hops max, 48 byte packets 1 192.168.12.254 (192.168.12.254) 0.682 ms 0.543 ms 0.506 ms 2 10.136.71.241 (10.136.71.241) 18.382 ms 20.533 ms 17.602 ms 3 172.16.19.146 (172.16.19.146) 22.372 ms 22.011 ms 22.478 ms 4 172.16.19.145 (172.16.19.145) 21.672 ms 21.664 ms 22.113 ms 5 194.230.108.185 (194.230.108.185) 19.564 ms 19.532 ms 19.533 ms 6 * * * 7 * * * 8 oer02pe05.ge1-0-19.bb.sunrise.net (212.161.250.138) 22.131 ms 22.230 ms 21.965 ms 9 195.141.229.234 (195.141.229.234) 21.793 ms 22.007 ms 21.611 ms 10 * * * 11 * * * (snip) >tracert local.ch Routenverfolgung zu local.ch [185.101.119.163] über maximal 30 Hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms 1 ms 192.168.12.254 2 18 ms 17 ms 18 ms 10.136.71.241 3 23 ms 22 ms 22 ms 172.16.19.146 4 23 ms 23 ms 22 ms 172.16.19.145 5 24 ms 20 ms 20 ms 194.230.108.185 6 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung. 7 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung. 8 87 ms 85 ms 83 ms oer02pe05.ge1-0-19.bb.sunrise.net [212.161.250.138] 9 87 ms 86 ms 79 ms 195.141.229.234 10 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung. 11 * * * Zeitüberschreitung der Anforderung. (snip) Inbound: (snip) .... 6 e1-19.c-r1.es34.nine.ch (5.148.160.143) 12.509 ms 11.148 ms 11.102 ms 7 194.230.36.32 (194.230.36.32) 1.271 ms 1.261 ms 1.214 ms 8 * * * 9 zur01are02.et-10-3-0.bb.sunrise.net (195.141.217.155) 1.355 ms 1.225 ms 1.088 ms 10 * * * 11 * * * 12 * * * 13 adsl-84-227-50-245.adslplus.ch (84.227.50.245) 22.971 ms 23.458 ms 23.962 ms 2016-08-16 13:44 GMT+02:00 peering <peer...@sunrise.net>: > Hi > Based on the current post at the swinog mailing list and a previous one > which discussed the topic in detail. In fact there is no obligation to not > use private IP Addresses for internet based Services. > Therefore be aware, that the seen RFC1918 Addresses has not been assigned > by sunrise. > Many Thanks for your understanding > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog