--- g...@space.net wrote: From: Gert Doering <g...@space.net> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 12:57:54PM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote: > Yeah, it's quite unfortunate that IPv4 ran out so suddenly, > barely 15 years after people were told to move towards IPv6. > --------------------------------------- > > > Especially after IETF made it backwards compatible and made > it so easy to switch from 4 to 6... ;-)
There's no way to make "something with longer addresses" compatible without IPv4 without changing everything (routers, endpoints) - so, that argument is usually one brought forward as one of a long list of standard excuses to avoid deploying IPv6, while at the same time blaming everyone else for the problems with IPv4. ------------------------------------------- Note the smiley face above. This one, too... :) I was not around for those discussions (and not being a computer science person, nor wanting to go on this for too long as has been endlessly done on other lists), but it seems TLV would have allowed 4 to be a subset of the new space. I never heard that discussed much and that's what I meant by my comment. scott _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
