> Am 23.04.2024 um 08:51 schrieb Serge Droz via swinog <swinog@lists.swinog.ch>: > > It's actually a pretty smart and light way of protection the majority of > users from malware. And yes, there will always be false positives. > > And yes, it's sad we have to do this, but that's mostly because our industry, > despite promising the contrary for years, doesn't seem to be able to offer > secure services and products. > > The fact is, that states are getting feed up with this and will start > legislating because we keep making empty promises and tell them they are > stupid. > > You don't have to believe me, but maybe you listen to John Curran: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U1Ip39Qv-Zk > > Sorry for the rant, but I feel your reply is condescending and uninformed. > Just throwing around words like "internet police" etc doesn't solve anything.
Did you understand the technical issue this approach has? Certificates don’t match, that is the issue. _______________________________________________ swinog mailing list -- swinog@lists.swinog.ch To unsubscribe send an email to swinog-le...@lists.swinog.ch
