"Neil J. McRae" wrote: > > We don't filter in the backbone other than the usual competant network > filters, Nico - whats the story in the access network?
Even if there is a "legal" requirement to filter it must not be done in the backbone because then we'll come out as the lowest common determinator. Especially in Switzerland where the traffic to/from the US has to go via some other countries. What do we get then? UK filter -> NL Filter -> DE Filter -> CH Filter -> not much left over :-( That's why I say the backbone must be kept filter free! Also downstreams to other ISPs must be kept filter free! If you absolutely have to filter then do it towards your own END- customers but not your ISP customers. They'll will/have to filter themselfes. When filtering is done in the backbones we'll have a massively frag- mented Internet. So it gets useless... Also for a democracy every ISP who filters must make the filter policy public and also must make public the filtered sites (IPs). The users and other networks admins must be able to challenge any filter! It could be WRONG, like in this case. The IPs of the target sites change all the time. Who keeps the filters up to date? Who cleans the filters up if sites disappear or the content changes?? -- Andre ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
