* on the Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 07:52:23PM +0100, Kurt A. Schumacher wrote: > and every SMTP port 25 traffic (or whatever required in the future) can > perfectly be forwarded to a designated server WITHOUT a possibility for > an intervention on the so called "customer" side.
Look, I wouldn't want my ISP to do that kind of bollocks, like auto-proxying me. So I sure as hell take care that the ISP I work for doesn't do such. The "so called" customer-side may very well have its own professionals, who really do not like being baby- sitted (or big-brothered...). That's why I object against such blockades. We block if we must, and only temporarily. A block is _not_ a remedy, and not a normal state, but a short-term solution for a problem at hand. For me, these blocks go along the same lines (and the same lines of thinking) as berlin firewalls. Seegras -- Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
