If you think this was a bug (beyond hypotheticality), you should know that this is actually ICU code, which we don't really maintain. (In a sense, we maintain our own version, but we mostly just mirror the official version of ICU and do a few minor patches to make it run in Borland.) So if you find a bug in this code, it is quite possibly the ICU team to whom you should report it.
However, I'm not sure how you're getting this compiler error. icu-sword compiles cleanly for me in both MSVC (6.0 & 7.1) and Borland C++ Builder (5.0). Make sure you're doing all of the conditional defines in your project file or makefile. Defining U_HAVE_PLACEMENT_NEW=0 should correct this problem.
--Chris
Lynn Allan wrote:
Inquiring (newbie) minds want to know:
* Does the Sword project have a suite of tools for regression testing?
The reason I ask: I'm trying to rebuild diatheke and ActiveDiatheke from "scratch", including the ICU versions. This involves libsword.icu and libsword6icu.lib. For the purposes of discussion, suppose I found what appears to be a bug, using this example (just hypothetically, of course)
uobject.h has multiple definitions of method delete because of #define U_HAVE_PLACEMENT_NEW which keeps it from compiling.
Further suppose I made a quick/dirty hack-fix and commented out my best guesstimate of the probable extra method. This lets the compile proceed.
It leads me to wonder: If I submitted this "fix", is there regression test suite to run against? If so, is this something a developer has access to? I'd like to avoid embarassing myself with a "fix" that breaks other code.
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
