Kahunapule Michael P. Johnson wrote:
Why is <q> a higher standard than a quotation mark? What if both were used?
<q> is a higher standard because it is the one required by OSIS.
<milestone type="x-noteStartAnchor" /> doesn't really have an exact equivalent, although there is a computationally more difficult way to specify the same kind of thing.
Yes, arguably more difficult to encode, but it does exist.
If there is a "standard" encoding for <w type="x-plural">, I missed it. What is it?
Something like <w morph="x-WEB:plural">
What are the "standard" ways of encoding different levels of poetry lines? The World English Bible uses 2 levels (type="x-primary" and type="x-secondary"), but some translations use 3 levels, usually rendered as three levels of hanging indent. These levels cannot be reliably inferred by counting from the beginning of the line group.
There is a level attribute on <l>.
--Chris
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
