On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 06:45:58PM -0700, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
<w lemma="strong:1">word1 word2</w> <w lemma="strong:2">word3 word4
word5</w> <w lemma="strong:3>word6</w> <w lemma="strong:4>word7 word8
word8</w>
Most printed Bibles with Strong's numbers merely insert numbers into
the text, imply the previous word or some number of words are related
to that number. Our NT human tagging allowed us to be exact, even
non-contiguous. We don't have this level of markup in the OT.
Dude, I'm so excited about all this work you're putting into this data!
I'm sure so many projects (inside and outside of CrossWire) will be
blessed by this!
Indeed. I was just getting my project kicked off based on the KJV2003
when I noticed some problems with the Strong's number markup in the OT.
I don't really want to delay my project, but if KJV2006 is less than a
few months away, I can wait.
Really, I don't think the connective words like "And the" should be
included as part of the Strong's number. They should be outside.
I've noticed some verses have the first word not surrounded by
appropriate tags giving the strongs number, yet other words are labelled
as "NIH" which is very convenient. Could we have all words put inside
tags like that for easier parsing?
Ted
--
It's not true unless it makes you laugh,
but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.
Eukleia: Ted Walther
Address: 5690 Pioneer Ave, Burnaby, BC V5H2X6 (Canada)
Contact: 604-430-4973
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
