On Wed, May 31, 2006 7:42 am, Chris Little said:
>
> The text we are distributing bears resemblances to all of the above
> texts, but is clearly not simply a corrupted copy of any of them. It is
> certainly not derived from the Revista e Atualizada text cited above.
>
> If our text closely matches one of the print editions I will examine,
> then we will know that it is a public domain text and I will post the
> corrected text that Jónatas Ferreira sent me. If it does not match any
> of them, then it will remain unclear what the ultimate source of our
> text is. However, it has been and presently continues to be my belief
> that this translation is what it claims to be, given our source and the
> other sites that offer this text as public domain.

Thanks Chris, I hope you can find the public domain source of the text so
that we will be finally be free of all the brouhaha that follows every
time someone volunteers to help with the PorAA. And everybody can then
focus on collaboration.

Sergio

_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to