reading over my emails I can see I did a very poor job of wording My opinion over the choice of license for sword was never intended to be conveyed. I personally am only concerned in the desired use of the sofware from a "spirit" and "letter" of the law/license. From a more legal perspective, can a non GPL (but an OSI approved license) interface with sword given the architecture is X, Y or Z?
I sincerely apologize for any offense I conveyed, that certainly was not my intention. However, I did notice that "poorly written" means non diplomatic. I just naively assumed my questions would be taken at face value and nothing read into them. Therefore, please respond to me directly and not the list of you disagree with what you believe my opinion is. I don't believe I stated it yet though. Attacks and the like do not look good on a public mailing list, the internet has a very long memory. No one has emailed me personally and only one has focused on what I asked (to which I am grateful). I suggest this either have the brakes put on or be taken offline. I won't even state my views on licensing here, it may surprise some of you however. Jason _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
