DM Smith <[email protected]> writes: > I don't see your point. I thought your original question was how a > module should be encoded, not how people should input a reference list.
I'm concerned with encoding in more than one context. Existing refs in pre-made modules are just one example of how such refs get used. But when users are editing their own content, and thus inputting a ref list, we cannot expect them to use osisref syntax. So when you say, "I'd like to see scripRef have the passage or osisref attribute, preferably the latter," you seem to neglect that those kinds of qualifiers are not going to be used by people generating their own content. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: [email protected] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
