I agree with Chris on this issue. CMS has been a debated topic in the past.
>From my conservative position, you must give a specific, real world problem we currently have which is not easily solved with our current infrastructure, or a real world benefit we are currently lacking because we do not have something labeled a "CMS", for us to even consider committing to the maintenance of another framework. Troy On 11/06/2010 12:22 PM, Chris Little wrote: > > > On 11/6/2010 3:49 AM, David Haslam wrote: >> We have an ftpmirror that does not keep track of updates to scripts and >> other software tools that we host. > > What you're referring to here (linking directly to the SVN versions of > perl scripts that we maintain) would be akin to replacing every single > binary we provide with nightly builds. We don't need to be publishing an > SVN commit that I made just over 12 hours ago when it hasn't even > undergone testing beyond one or two USFM docs. The perl scripts change > seldom and slowly, and they are used and tested by very few people. > > --Chris > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page