Absolutely not. Go have a baby! Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 10:24 PM, scribe...@gmail.com ><scr...@crosswire.org> wrote: >> BibleCS, per my preference, only shows hover-over symbols for the >note or cross reference, and does not include the 'n' label. BibleCS >uses different filters though, so not affected. >> >> SWORDWeb will be affected. >> >> My thought on this is similar to strongs. Don't show the numbers. >They are left overs from the era of print-only. >> >> The exception use case is possibly our NET module which has a >commentary accompaniment module which might refer to footnotes by >label. If I remember correctly. >> >> So, I would like the choice to not have the label for the frontends I >maintain, but if users really want to see the label, I could be swayed >on this point, wearing my frontend developer hat. >> >> But I don't want to take away the choice from other potential >frontend developers. >> >> I understand Karl's desire to not want Xiphos and all other frontend >developers to do the work of adding the label, if everyone mostly wants >the label. >> >> Can we have both? > >SWModule::RenderText(bool includeNumbers=false) > >Would that do the trick? > >--Greg > >> >> Karl, I haven't looked at your patch yet, but is there a way to wrap >the label in a <span class="[fn,cx]-label"> then I can simply set >display:none for these in swordweb? >> >> Troy >> >> Greg Hellings <greg.helli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>Bible Time does its own thing and wouldn't be bothered by this >change. >>>It >>>dispenses with any semblance of delineation. Both notes and cross >>>references are marked with "(*)" everywhere they appear. >>> >>>--Greg >>>On Feb 7, 2012 9:38 PM, "Karl Kleinpaste" <k...@kleinpaste.org> >wrote: >>> >>>> To date, we have DM in support of n=X content in *n/*x, as well as >>>Brian >>>> noting that consistency should be supported in that note numbers >>>provide >>>> the common language of note reference. >>>> >>>> No one has suggested that such an update is a bad idea, though Troy >>>> wondered aloud the other night in #xiphos about choice being taken >>>away. >>>> Considering that no other frontend (to my knowledge) makes any >effort >>>to >>>> do Xiphos-style post-processing in order to get n=X content into >>>place, >>>> personally I think the question of choice is moot: All other >>>frontends >>>> simply take the null choice, that is, whatever the engine gives >them, >>>> n=X-less. >>>> >>>> My inclination remains to commit the patch, but I'm concerned that >so >>>> little feedback has been seen. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >>>> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>>> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >>>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >>>http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >>>Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >> >> -- >> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > >_______________________________________________ >sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org >http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel >Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page