Yes, Xiphos in Linux is perfect. On Friday, July 20, 2012, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Andrew Thule <thules...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> writes: > > Karl, fonts 'appear' rendered differently in the main window (large > > upper right where bible text appears) and not rendered at all (in > > windows) in the pane immediately to the left (upper left above the > > previewer pane), which I understand (perhaps incorrectly) pulls some > > info from the .conf file. > > > > In the 'module pane' upper left where you select modules, the > > Inuktitut font is not being found/rendered. I'm getting those obtuse > > UTF8 boxes you get when fonts appear to be missing. > > Oh, that. Now I understand. You mean the language names in the module > selection tree itself. > > Yes, Inuktitut is a problematic font. > > This is a Windows-centric problem. We have no knowledge of where > Windows as a whole, or GTK-under-Windows (one of the several display > toolkits Xiphos must use), finds its idea of default application font. > Surprisingly to me, Windows seems the most crippled as to font awareness > when compared to any UNIX or Linux system, which invariably in my > experience are perfectly capable of handling such fonts. When my Linux > system first wants to display a new font, GTK-driven programs pop a > dialog to ask if they should go hunt it down. If someone knows how to > handle such problems in Windows, I'm sure we'd all appreciate the > education. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org <javascript:;> > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page >
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page