Didn't mean this to become a JSword thread. We're using Java 5 which does not
have any notion of script. So we roll our own and replace it when we get to
Java 7.
The question still remains, is _ intended in the module conf? If so, we'll
change JSword code to handle it.
In Him,
DM
On Feb 10, 2013, at 3:26 PM, Chris Burrell <ch...@burrell.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi DM/Chris
>
> The standard is defined in BCP47 which only supports a '-'.
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47)
>
> as documented by JAVA here:
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/util/Locale.html#def_variant.
> Java seems to support both a dash and an underscore.
>
> DM, we should ideally be using the Java functionality which supports both,
> rather than implementing our own decoding scheme. Not sure what we do/don't
> do here.
> Chris
>
>
>
> On 10 February 2013 20:09, DM Smith <dmsm...@crosswire.org> wrote:
> Chris,
> We've got this in JSword (not sure it works) for a while now for the next
> release. We used the codes as you've given here. But in the conf file you
> have ur_Deva. We're not expecting an _ but a -. We can change the code.
> Please advise.
>
> In Him,
> DM
>
> On Feb 10, 2013, at 5:56 AM, Chris Little <chris...@crosswire.org> wrote:
>
> > Just a quick heads up:
> >
> > In general, locale codes (the Lang= field of .confs) can have subtags that
> > indicate region, script, etc. Ideally these should be dealt with in some
> > fashion by front ends since they identify important distinctions (in the
> > eyes of the module maker or publisher at least).
> >
> > When unknown subtags are encountered, it's probably best to recursively
> > fall back to the tag minus its right-most subtag. For example, if
> > 'en-Latn-US' is unknown, fall back to 'en-Latn'. If that is unknown, fall
> > back to 'en'. (Hopefully nearly all language subtags are known.)
> >
> > We should handle this in the library, but currently don't. :(
> >
> >
> > As a specific case in point:
> > We now have two Urdu translations. They're the same translation and differ
> > in their script (one is Arabic, the other Devanagari). Their language codes
> > (as of the 1.2.1 release just made, which corrected the code for the
> > Devanagari version) are: ur (Urdu in Arabic script--the usual script for
> > Urdu) and ur-Deva (Urdu in Devanagari script).
> >
> > Possible behaviors are to categorize the ur-Deva module as belonging to an
> > unknown language (bad), to fall back and categorize it as simply Urdu
> > (better, but certainly confusing if the language name is written in Arabic
> > and the module is itself written in Devanagari), or to categorize it
> > separately as Urdu written in Devanagari (best).
> >
> > For implementers who localize the language name, Urdu written in Arabic is
> > written "اردو". Urdu written in Devanagari is written "उर्दू".
> >
> > --Chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
>
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
