Wouldn't this be classified as a bug in JSword? However, I do agree that it would be nice to update the description of the KJVA to indicate the difference between it and the KJV module, but are there good arguments for the descriptions to be the same?
But, again, I'd be tempted to classify this as a bug in JSword, as SWORD is the spec that we work from? just my 2 cents...... :) On 16/07/2013, at 6:00 PM, David Haslam <dfh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > JSword based front-ends not only need to have a different module name and > have their own path location, but the descriptions must be unique too! > > I already discussed this with DM Smith in regard to Bible Desktop. > > See http://crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:conf_Files#Uniqueness > > So - yes - the KJVA Description ought to be different from the KJV. > > I have therefore added an issue in our tracker. > > http://www.crosswire.org/tracker/browse/MOD-250 > > David > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/KJVA-tp4652823p4652828.html > Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
