Just do it. Cent from my fone so theer mite be tipos. ;)
> On Oct 27, 2013, at 5:05 AM, Chris Little <chris...@crosswire.org> wrote: > > It's been over 4 years since the release of Sword 1.6.0, when av11n was > introduced. I believe that every front end that is still maintained now > supports (to one degree or another) av11n modules. > > Following the release of Sword 1.7.0, I no longer produce separate KJV-v11n > and av11n versions of modules when producing updates. Also, because of > changes to the way osis2mod produces modules, all new Bible and commentary > module releases are tagged as requiring Sword 1.7.0. > > > Would now perhaps be a good time to merge the raw and avraw repositories > (i.e. get rid of the avraw repository and allow av11n material in raw)? I > don't mind our hosting multiple repositories, but the av11n vs. non-av11n > distinction is not one that I think our users ought to need to worry about. > It just brings confusion. > > --Chris > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
