On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 04:17:24AM -0800, Chris Little wrote:
It's unclear whether you are working entirely from an ODT exported from Wikisource articles or are also using the CzeBKR module exported via osis2mod, but there's no way we would distribute content produced via either of these methods.
The former, as the CzeBKR as it currently stands is faulty (using the first edition text for the New Testament).
Wikisource can be a good source for Bibles, but there are a couple of very significant problems with how you are using Wikisource. The first problem is that you aren't using the Wikisource source text, you're using something that has already been transformed into ODT.
It has been exported to ODT by the Wikisource page itself. http://cs.wikisource.org/w/index.php?title=Speci%C3%A1ln%C3%AD:Kniha&bookcmd=book_creator&referer=Bible+kralick%C3%A1
Meaning, I AM working on the WikiSource text (or there is some serious bug in their software, but I’d bet it’s better than what we have).
But see below ... I will drop ODT efforts alltogether. It is not worthy.
unnecessarily introduces the potential for errors. It's also much, much easier to transform Wiki markup to OSIS than it is to transform ODT to OSIS.
I hoped for the OSIS OpenOffice filter to work. Apparently, it doesn’t.
If you intend to use Wikisource as a source text, use the underlying Wiki document and write a script to pull a fresh copy from Wikisource so that changes to the Wikisource copy can be easily integrated into updates. If you'd like an example Python script that downloads documents from Wikisource and generates an OSIS document, I can send you one.
You are right. It really was easy http://luther.ceplovi.cz/git/czebkr.git/tree/get_text.py
"Maintainer" contact info is not useful or necessary because "maintainers" usually maintain their submissions very little if at all. Module bugs go into the bug tracker. From there, we assign the bugs to the appropriate maintainer. If you feel the need to sign your module, you can add a note at the end of the About section.
I understand that you insist to having everything under thecontrol and in secrecy (why would y'all otherwise hide maintainers, and also see the recent discussion on SVN v. DVCS), but I don’t think it is the best way how to encourage community collaboration. But that’s your choice (or rather, choice of everybody behind the project).
https://lwn.net/Articles/370157/
Could somebody upload to our repository http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/tmp/CzeCSP.zip with the new version, please?We do not accept submissions of compiled modules. Submissions are still done the same way as they were two years ago: send the OSIS file or a link to it to modu...@crosswire.org.
Sorry, you are right. I will. Blessings, Matěj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mcepl<at>ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC A GOOD name is rather to be chosen than great riches. -- Proverbs 22:1
pgpF92rWf1Tdq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
