On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 12:21 -0700, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > I think it is important to maintain the > SWCom distinction and that SWCom should not conceptually inherit SWText, > though I do understand why you propose such to reduce code duplication.
Complex commentaries I have seen will re-run a chapter or book several times - synopsis, in detail and in more detail etc. And then throw a few extra articles in on subjects raised by the text. And right now we are hard pressed to cover that easily. That is right. So commentaries and Bible text are/should be ideally different. I would guess though - and I am far from sure if this makes a blind bit of difference in terms of code saving, if the inheritance was the other way round - SWText inheriting from SWCom and basically offering a simplified version of the same if this would not be a possible way to go. In general, it would be useful if either drivers would allow more complexity - study bibles are pretty hard to implement completely. Peter _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page