I don't believe an app which isn't updated should be removed from the
website just because it isn't updated. Maybe it just works for its
purpose and doesn't need to be updated. This is true for many of our
apps: GoBible, SWORDWeb, Flashcards, and many others.
It's not that I don't want active development. Sure, adding new
features is great. But just because an app hasn't been released in ages
doesn't mean it should be removed from our app list.
Troy
On 03/11/2015 10:30 AM, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
Dependent on the responses, it might be time to do some cleaning out
of the application page of the website.
*Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 11. März 2015 um 16:57 Uhr
*Von:* "Karl Kleinpaste" <k...@kleinpaste.org>
*An:* "sword devel" <sword-devel@crosswire.org>
*Betreff:* [sword-devel] how dead are the apps?
It's been observed to me more than once recently that most of the apps
have gone stagnant, dead, no ongoing development. How true is this
assertion?
Personally I know about only Xiphos, which has been relatively busy
other than the last couple weeks, and PocketSword, whose 1.4.7 was
released in late January.
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing
list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to
unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
