On 2015-08-16, 23:07 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > On 08/16/2015 05:55 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >> Shouldn’t that library be /usr/lib64/libbiblesync.so.1.1.2 ? > Absolutely. Did you update biblesync.spec appropriately when it was > built, and did you build it from the right .tar.gz in the first place?
I didn’t build it, it was downloaded from the official EPEL repo. When I rebuilt from the dist-git, I got the same wrong result: $ rpm -qlp x86_64/biblesync-1.1.2-3.el7.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib64/libbiblesync.so.1.1 /usr/share/doc/biblesync-1.1.2 /usr/share/doc/biblesync-1.1.2/LICENSE $ The specfile is http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/biblesync.git/tree/biblesync.spec?h=epel7 (yes, I have exactly the same file locally, MD5SUM 1d3fb32a04df42c411868785775549e4). Why in the world, we define that __soversion macro? I have never in my life with SPEC files (that’s eight plus years) saw such gymnastics with SOVERSION and it seems suspicious. Best, Matěj -- http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mc...@ceplovi.cz GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that. -- George Carlin _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page