On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 02:05 -0700, David Haslam wrote: > Still waiting for a response!
The inline placement is currently not respected. The note becomes a footnote. There are a couple of issues here: 1) libsword treats only one type of notes in a separate and distinct way - (type="crossReference). all other types are classed the same as footnotes without further workup. I am not sure (but reading of osisxhtml.cpp in src/modules/filters will show what is happening), but I do not think we pass on the type attribute (nor indeed the placement attribute) to the frontends) 2) "placement" is in essence presentational, the semantics in the example you have given is hidden in the x-DHSource attribute Personally I would not be averse to making a lot more of the various OSIS types of notes - it can be easily done by passing the "type" attribute on if it is not already done so + creating a different presentation for different types. Further of interest though, but more complicated would be to add GlobalOptionFilters for different types of notes. I am less convinced of respecting the placement attribute as this is difficult to do in a consistent way across frontends and devices and adds little to the usability. But, none of that would help when people use extensions to the OSIS standard. x-DHSource is unlikely ever going to be usefully dealt with. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
