The page I referenced said the 1100 AD Masoretic text is modern. I didn't see Peter's response. Still haven't. Don't know what you are agreeing with. In your response via nabble you gave no context. It broke the thread. I thought you were agreeing with me earlier when I hadn't given a position about which. Thus my response. Please stop breaking the threads. But at least give context of response. Please.
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 12:42 PM, David Haslam <dfh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > "Ancient" is a relative term anyway. > > cf. All Anglicans will remember the book, "Hymns, Ancient and Modern." > > Wikipedia denotes them as Classical Hebrew (hbo) and Modern Hebrew (heb). > > I agree with Peter. > > > David > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Language-codes-for-Hebrew-tp4655473p4655674.html > Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
