On 02/23/2017 04:27 PM, Matt Zabojnik wrote: > > Any feedback on this? I see several of y'all have downloaded. Is this > thing Go for launch? > It's fine, but as you said, you just replaced the images with higher-def versions - the bdt, dat, and idx content is identical and the .conf diff is only 3 lines, enough to identify a distinct module. My preference would be to do just that (replace images) in SmithBibleAtlas, bump its version stamp, and not introduce a new module name having no genuinely distinct content.
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
