Is PocketSword unique among SWORD based front-ends in being the only one where all searches must use the Lucene search index? I think so.
i.e. You cannot perform a non-Lucene search with PocketSword. With my observations about Coptic to the fore, this essentially means that you cannot use PocketSword to search modules that have a non-Roman script such as Coptic. If it was due to which Unicode version Lucene supports, there may be other scripts such as *Ethiopic Extended* (added under 4.1) that present the same symptoms. That's a strong added reason for the PocketSword developers to facilitate a non-indexed search method, at least as a user option. Nic's already thinking about this, in view of the greater processing power of more recent Apple iOS based devices. Best regards, David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/PocketSword-and-non-Lucene-search-tp4657130.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
