On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:29 AM Troy A. Griffitts <scr...@crosswire.org> wrote:
> Greg, what's the output, or at least the couple lines of output from your > failed unit test? It might help. When I saw your note, I had suspected it > was because of something I had installed on my machine that was enabling > the test to pass (/etc/sword.conf) or something. But I've removed what I > thought might be helping and I still pass all unit tests here on F32 using > autotools to build. > Oh yes, that's probably relevant! $ ./runtest.sh verseparsing-utf8 Script failed at: (- bad output; + should have been) --- verseparsing-utf8.try 2020-07-26 08:45:12.077941691 -0400 +++ verseparsing-utf8.good 2020-07-26 08:43:25.621662269 -0400 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -Matthäus 2:3-12 de KJV ge 1: -Römer 2:13 de KJV ge 1: -Matthäus 1:2-Röm 3:13 de KJV ge 1: -1. Könige 2 de KJV ge 1: -1. Könige - 2. Könige; Markus 1:1; Matthäus 2:1; Matthäus; 1.Kön de KJV ge 1: Markus 1:1 -1. Könige - 2. Könige; Markus 1:1; Matthäus 2:1; Matthäus; 1.Kön-2.Kön;I Kings-Matthäus de KJV ge 1: Markus 1:1; 1. K�nige 1:1-Markus 1:1 -Maleachi 1:1 - Matthäus 2:1 de KJV ge 1: Maleachi 1:1-Offenbarung 22:21 +Matthäus 2:3-12 de KJV ge 1: Matthäus 2:3-Matthäus 2:12 +Römer 2:13 de KJV ge 1: Römer 2:13 +Matthäus 1:2-Röm 3:13 de KJV ge 1: Matthäus 1:2-Römer 3:13 +1. Könige 2 de KJV ge 1: 1. Könige 2:1-1. Könige 2:46 +1. Könige - 2. Könige; Markus 1:1; Matthäus 2:1; Matthäus; 1.Kön de KJV ge 1: 1. Könige 1:1-2. Könige 25:30; Markus 1:1; Matthäus 2:1; Matthäus 1:1-Matthäus 28:20; 1. Könige 1:1-1. Könige 22:53 +1. Könige - 2. Könige; Markus 1:1; Matthäus 2:1; Matthäus; 1.Kön-2.Kön;I Kings-Matthäus de KJV ge 1: 1. Könige 1:1-2. Könige 25:30; Markus 1:1; Matthäus 2:1; Matthäus 1:1-Matthäus 28:20; 1. Könige 1:1-2. Könige 25:30; 1. Könige 1:1-Matthäus 28:20 +Maleachi 1:1 - Matthäus 2:1 de KJV ge 1: Maleachi 1:1-Matthäus 2:1 It appears the test isn't even trying to parse the inputs? It's certainly not giving any output to make it look like it is. --Greg > Hope we can figure it out, > > Troy > > > On 7/25/20 5:46 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: > > Quick question - maybe a longer answer. Mostly for Troy, as you're > probably the only one familiar with this code: > > I'm trying to get the testsuit working in the CMake build. Things seem to > be going great. I can get 13/14 tests passing. But I've had a long-nagging > issue with getting verparsing-utf8 to pass in the CMake build. I'm building > with -D_ICU_ throughout, so it's not that the flag is missing. I'm also not > getting passing results out of the autotools build, so this isn't just a > problem with CMake - although in the past I've had systems where I could > get the autotools build to work properly but the CMake one would not. > > I don't know enough about running a C++ debugger to dig into where the > problem lives. The verseparsing-utf8 is clear that the library needs ICU in > order for it to work, and it shows up in the list of linked libraries off > the sword library and in the compile flags. > > I assume the tests are still working for you? If so, any hints I can use > to track down why it's not working for me? > > --Greg > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: > sword-devel@crosswire.orghttp://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
_______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page